Edamame vs Green peas (cooked)

The short answer

Both bright green pod vegetables. Edamame (young soybeans) carries far more protein and fat; green peas are lighter, sweeter and higher in carbs. Edamame for a protein-rich snack or side, peas for a sweet, light vegetable.

Edamame and Green peas (cooked), per 100 g and per portion. A gap means USDA has no value for it — not zero.

Edamame · per 100 gGreen peas (cooked) · per 100 g
Calories12184
Protein11.9 g5.4 g
Fat5.2 g0.2 g
Carbs8.9 g15.6 g
Fiber5.2 g5.5 g
Sugars2.2 g5.9 g
Sodium6 mg3 mg
Vitamins & minerals — where both carry data
Calcium63 mg27 mg
Folate311 µg63 µg
Iron2.3 mg1.5 mg
Magnesium64 mg39 mg
Niacin0.9 mg2 mg
Phosphorus169 mg117 mg
Potassium436 mg271 mg
Riboflavin0.2 mg0.1 mg
Thiamin0.2 mg0.3 mg
Vitamin A15 µg40 µg
Vitamin B120 µg0 µg
Vitamin B60.1 mg0.2 mg
Vitamin C6.1 mg14.2 mg
Vitamin D0 µg0 µg
Vitamin E0.7 mg0.1 mg
Vitamin K26.7 µg25.9 µg
Zinc1.4 mg1.2 mg
At equal calories (per 100 kcal)
ProteinEdamame: 9.8 g, Green peas (cooked): 6.4 g · FiberEdamame: 4.3 g, Green peas (cooked): 6.5 g · SodiumEdamame: 5 mg, Green peas (cooked): 3.6 mg

Generic USDA foods (not brands), so both carry micronutrients. Numbers are per 100 g unless the portion toggle is on. USDA FoodData Central, as of 2026-08-12.

Common questions
Is Edamame or Green peas (cooked) better?

Neither is “better” on its own — it depends what you want from it. The table shows where each is higher; the short answer says when each one fits. Compare on the same basis (per 100 g) and pick for your dish and your goal.

How were these numbers worked out?

Straight from USDA FoodData Central for the generic form of each food, per 100 g. We show the portion view too, but portion sizes differ between foods, so per 100 g is the fair comparison.

Why does one column say “no data”?

Because USDA has no value for that nutrient in that food — so we leave it blank rather than print a 0 that would read as “none”. A real zero from USDA still shows as 0.

More in Plant protein